Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

AFL Insider - April 2008

Helping The Melbourne Football Club Week: Sandringham Versus Melbourne

Sandringham has been a great success in recent years while Melbourne hasn't really achieved a lot. Sandringham is like a well-oiled machine that dispenses opposition teams with ease, if Melbourne is a machine there is no oil, very little fuel and the gasket needs replacing. The strange thing is, a lot of Sandringham's success has been possible due to Melbourne's players.

Last weekend really showed how each team fares in their competition, Sandringham destroyed their opponent while Melbourne had a lot of trouble and a big loss. If they played against each other last round, Melbourne versus Sandringham, it might have been a close game.



Mel FB James Frawley, Nathan Carroll, Daniel Bell
San FF Ben Holland, Nicholas Sautner, Matthew Bate

Mel HB Paul Wheatley, Jared Rivers, Cameron Bruce
San HF Ezra Poyas, Roderick Crowe, Addam Maric

Mel C Brad Green, Brock McLean, Clint Bartram
San C Simon Buckley, Peter Summers, Shane Valenti

Mel HF Cale Morton, Russell Robertson, Colin Sylvia
San HB Kyle Cheney, Chris Lamb, Tomi Johnston

Mel FF Aaron Davey, Brad Miller, Austin Wonaeamirri
San FB Jace Bode, Stefan Martin, Chris Johnson

Mel Foll Jeff White, James McDonald, Nathan Jones
San Foll Jake Spencer, Chad Liddell, Adem Yze


Mel bench Lynden Dunn, Mark Jamar, Brent Moloney, Matthew Warnock
San bench John Meesen, Shane Tregear, Chris Waller, Guy Martyn


There are a lot of positives for Melbourne when they look at how good Sandringham is. Bate, Maric and probably Valenti all belong in Melbourne's best 22. Add those three to Melbourne's forward line and it becomes more versatile, skilled and exciting.

Buckley, Johnson, Bode and Martin should all see some AFL action soon. Melbourne can elevate another rookie, Valenti deserves it while Spencer would certainly give them extra height. Meesen shares the ruck duties at Sandringham but his best spot might be at full forward, there isn't a vacancy at that position for Sandringham but there is at Melbourne.


One thing that Sandringham have under control is the key positions, and Sautner, Crowe and Lamb always deliver in the VFL. Liddell keeps going and there are few in the VFL better than Ezra.

If these two teams did play last weekend, Melbourne would have won because they have Jeff White. But Sautner, Bate and Maric would have been a handful for the Melbourne defenders and the battle of the small onballers might have been a draw.

Melbourne fans can look forward to September, as their reserves team could win a trophy. It might also give an idea of how to win to some of the Demons' younger players and in the future they will bring that to AFL level.
Add CommentsAdd Comments
64
Vote
   


Player Of The Week

If a player keeps a star midfielder to 13 possessions it means they had a very good game, if they do that and also get the ball 33 times themselves, then they can call themselves the player of the week.

Kane Cornes kept Nick Dal Santo quiet when the Saints had the ball, and when Port Adelaide were in control it was Kane Cornes who often had it. 19 kicks and 14 handballs, along with 6 marks and 3 tackles, were some of his big numbers for the game.

Kane Cornes playing without Chad Cornes is a bit like the Blowfish without Hootie, but Kane Cornes wasn't troubled when Chad left in the first quarter last week and Kane will be one of the players who has to cover the loss of Chad over the next few weeks.


Kane Cornes' profile at the Port Adelaide site


Round 5, Player Of The Week
Add CommentsAdd Comments
69
Vote
   


Helping The Melbourne Football Club Week: 2008

2008 at Melbourne should be all about their previous 150 years, so while the playing list is going to have a review and cleanout the entertainment for the fans should be what happened before.



Shaun Smith, cleared for takeoff.



Some images from The Sun's 1988 Grand Final preview. Lou Richards certainly thought Melbourne would win, as did many others that day but it didn't happen. To the right of the tips from the captains and coaches is the match day information for the 1988 VFL Grand Final. Football starting at 9am, the Channel 7 Grand Final marathon actually being a marathon and finishing at 7:50am. $29 for a seat.








Some Melbourne highlights through the years.



Melbourne Win

Add CommentsAdd Comments
71
Vote
   


Helping The Melbourne Football Club Week: Nathan Jones

Plenty more coming up about Melbourne, although today's post isn't something that is important to the future of the Melbourne Football Club. It is a song, called Nathan Jones, presented by Bananarama.


Warning: Football fans who are not supporters of the Demons should not view this music video multiple times, you don't want this song getting stuck in your head and then go to see Collingwood versus Hawthorn and start singing "Nathan Jones you've been gone too long".


Nathan Jones

You packed your bags as I recall
And you walked slowly down the hall
You said you had to get away to ease your mind
And all you needed was a just little of time

Oh winter's passed, spring and fall
You never wrote me, you never called
Nathan Jones you've been gone too long
Gone too long...

If a woman could die of tears
Nathan Jones, well, I wouldn't be here
The key that you're holding won't fit my door
And there's no room in my heart for you no more

'Cause, winter's passed, spring and fall
you never wrote me, you never called
Nathan Jones you've been gone too long
Gone too long

Nathan Jones, Nathan Jones...
Nathan Jones, ooh..

Winter's passed, spring and fall
You never wrote me, you never called
Nathan Jones you've been gone too long
Gone too long

Nathan Jones you've been gone too long
...gone too long
Nathan Jones you've been gone too long
...gone too long
Nathan Jones you've been gone too long
... gone too long
Add CommentsAdd Comments
71
Vote
   


Helping The Melbourne Football Club Week: Trading For Youth

It should be a win-win-win situation when Melbourne discuss trades after the 2008 season finishes. Melbourne can get draft picks or young players, other clubs can acquire established stars and these players can leave Melbourne for a real chance at a premiership. Melbourne fans should be looking forward to a lot of excitement after the season ends, so while they may not be part of the September action they will be making news in the months after that. Melbourne need plenty of ideas for their rebuilding, here are some that won't happen, and maybe a few that will.


Aaron Davey to Essendon for Scott Gumbleton

Why for Melbourne: Melbourne need to find two future stars and put them at full forward and centre half forward. The drafts will help, but finding a prospect or two from other clubs is also a good idea. Gumbleton can either wait for his time at Essendon, or go to Melbourne and be the main option immediately.

Why for Essendon: Davey and Davey, how could Essendon turn that down, although the price of Gumbleton would make them think about it. The Bombers have Lloyd and Lucas for a few more seasons, Johns is another option up forward as are Daniher and Neagle, so the loss of Gumbleton is something they can cover. Aaron Davey and Alwyn Davey together in the forward line kicking goals and chasing defenders, with Essendon looking to play a faster game it has to be a trade they would consider and their fans would appreciate as it would be very entertaining.



Cameron Bruce and Brad Green to Hawthorn for their first and second round picks

Why for Melbourne: It is all about the players' ages, and when Melbourne do again become a contender it is likely that Bruce and Green have retired. The Demons need all the first and second round picks they can get.

Why for Hawthorn: If the Hawks don't win it all this year they will need to find a veteran player or two that can push them over the top. Bruce and Green would improve the Hawks. Hawthorn and Melbourne could be ideal trading partners, as the Hawks will want a star or two to make them a premiership team while the Hawks can also afford to trade some of their picks and youth and that is what Melbourne needs.



Jeff White to St Kilda for their first round pick

Why for Melbourne: He is still a very good player but for Melbourne to rebuild they need to trade him now. For White, he deserves a chance to win a premiership and it won't happen at the Demons.

Why for St Kilda: The Saints have sent out picks for players like Brooks and Watt, they can certainly send out a first rounder for Jeff White. The ruck spot was neglected for a number of years by the Saints, White would be their best ruckman they have had in a long time and his game, based around athleticism, would be complimented by the strength of King or Gardiner.



Russell Robertson to Sydney for their second round pick

Why for Melbourne: Robertson nearly went to the Bulldogs last offseason and the Demons may have benefited if they did trade him then, his trade value is only going to go down so next trade period they need to move him.

Why for Sydney: At the best of times they struggle to kick a lot of goals, so Robertson would add something there. Forwards that are sent to Sydney seem to play better, and for longer, so Robertson should enjoy the change.



Melbourne can also look to trade some of their players for others that can't get a game at their clubs or those who may want to move to Melbourne for a bigger role.

Ryan Jackson - Carlton: The addition of Judd and the return to health of Stevens sent Jackson back to the VFL.

Chris Dawes - Collingwood: Even when Rocca retires there will still be Cloke and Reid, and Brown and Goldsack at the other end, while Dawes could step right into a key forward spot at Melbourne.

Shannon Cox - Collingwood: A versatile player that can't find a spot in the Collingwood side.

Angus Monfries - Essendon: Seems to be waiting for his midfield role at Essendon, maybe at Melbourne he would get it.

Simon Hogan - Geelong: A speedy midfielder and forward, he is what Melbourne need.

Brent Prismall - Geelong: Probably not the type of midfielder that Melbourne need, but he will be a name mentioned in trade week.

Jarryd Morton - Hawthorn: The Hawks are the team to raid for young talent, they are loaded with it and can't afford to keep them all. Jarryd would be a regular player with Melbourne, along with his brother Cale, while his chances at Hawthorn are limited.

Max Bailey - Hawthorn: Taylor has pushed Bailey into the background at Hawthorn, so even when Bailey overcomes his injuries he will be waiting a while for another chance to play for the Hawks.

Mitch Thorp - Hawthorn: Might cost a lot to trade for, unless he is coming out of contract.

Lachlan Hansen - Kangaroos: If he was a Demon and not a Kangaroo he might have been playing every week.

Todd Goldstein - North Melbourne: Behind McIntosh, Petrie and Hale at the moment so a move to Melbourne might be beneficial for him.

Daniel Connors - Richmond: Close to getting a game for the Tigers, but could be a star at Melbourne and a replacement for Robertson.

James Gwilt - St Kilda: While his role at the Saints might be more important when Hudghton retires, he could move to Melbourne and have a much better chance of playing.

Shaun Higgins - Western Bulldogs: Could be a big star in the midfield at Melbourne, while his role at the Bulldogs is still as a player off the bench.

Malcolm Lynch - Western Bulldogs: With Hill's breakout season, Lynch is going to be in the VFL.



Finding Victorian players that want to return to their home state is another trade option for the Demons.

Chris Knights - Adelaide: Melbourne can give him a much bigger role and possibly the captaincy in the future.

Matt Tyler - Brisbane: Wouldn't cost a lot in trade, especially if he was adamant about leaving the Lions. Might become the third tall defender that Melbourne need.

Ryan Murphy - Fremantle: Melbourne need a full forward, here is an option.

Robert Warnock - Fremantle: Melbourne need a ruckman, here is an option.

David Mundy - Fremantle: His development seems to have slowed down as Fremantle are having some troubles, if Mundy goes to Melbourne he could be used in a role like Brad Green is now.

Steven Salopek - Port Adelaide: Maybe he wants to be the top player for his club in the middle, he can do that at Melbourne but will be behind the Cornes and Burgoynes for a few more years at the Power.

Mitch Brown - West Coast: If he wants to return to Victoria, there is a spot at centre half forward for Melbourne for him.

Matt Rosa - West Coast: Already dropped to the WAFL this season, there is a spot on the wing at Melbourne for him.

Ashley Hansen - West Coast: Still young enough to be part of the rebuilding at Melbourne, and his time at the Eagles might be coming to an end with McKinley and Kennedy there.
Add CommentsAdd Comments
73
Vote
   


Helping The Melbourne Football Club Week: Melbourne 2011

2011 FB Clint Bartram 23, James Frawley 22, Jack Grimes 22

2011 HB Ricky Petterd 22, Jared Rivers 26, ????

2011 C Cale Morton 21, Nathan Jones 23, ????

2011 HF Matthew Bate 24, ???? , ????

2011 FF Austin Wonaeamirri 22, ???? , Addam Maric 21

2011 Foll ???? , Brock McLean 25, Brent Moloney 27


The above team is who could be part of the best 18 for season 2011, only using the younger players at Melbourne. So anyone older than Brent Moloney was not considered. Positions that may need addressing were marked by ????. The approximate ages of the players in 2011 have also been included.

Buckley, Bell and Dunn are among many young players there who might also be a chance for their best lineup in 2011. Newton or Meesen could be in one of the tall forward spots, maybe Paul Johnson if he stays healthy.

The upcoming drafts will need to bring in big forwards and ruckmen. One more tall defender is also needed. Slow midfielders should not be a priority, Melbourne need speed.

Two or three picks from each of the next two drafts would be expected to become members of this 2011 side. With a priority pick this season a real possibility, the Demons will have three picks in the top 20. They might, and really should, also add another first rounder or two by trading some veterans. That will be addressed in a future post here.



Melbourne Fun Fact: The Super Macs

Once it was Peter McNamara and Paul McNamee who were a formidable team. McNamee is at Melbourne, and a McNamara is there too, young defender Tom McNamara.

Add CommentsAdd Comments
65
Vote
   


It’s Helping The Melbourne Football Club Week

Melbourne need a bit of help at the moment, so evaluating their draft needs and their player list might be useful.

Also expect a few interesting Melbourne items from 20 years ago.
Add CommentsAdd Comments
64
Vote
   


Player Of The Week

A shootout between a couple of big forwards was expected when Brisbane hosted Hawthorn. It was Lance Franklin for one team, but surprisingly Daniel Bradshaw was the Brisbane forward. Franklin won the game for the Hawks and was the best player for the round, although Ablett was a close second.

Brisbane knew they were in trouble as they had few options to try to contain Franklin. Patfull, Merrett and the other Lions did put in the effort but Franklin was just too good.

Franklin had 8 goals and 6 behinds, he might have missed a couple he should have kicked but also had some goals that most other players couldn't get on their best day. He had 9 marks, often they were taken at full speed on the lead with a defender right there with him. 17 kicks by Franklin was easily the highest amount by any player in that game.


Lance Franklin's profile at the Hawthorn site


Round 4, Player Of The Week
Add CommentsAdd Comments
66
Vote
   


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Western Bulldogs

1 - Adam Cooney

4 - Farren Ray

50 - Iszac Thompson

62 - pass


From The Age: Who your team picked
The club says "Our destiny was set out a bit with picks 1 and 4 and it fell the way we thought. We’ve got two exciting players and our last pick (Iszac Thompson) was speculative. He’s a 185-centimetre flanker-type who was an All-Australian under-16 and had glandular fever this year, but he’s got some terrific athletic attributes and we’ll be very patient with him."
Scott Clayton, recruiting manager


It isn't the Bulldogs' fault that they didn't use this draft, and two early picks, to become a contender. Other drafts have Riewoldt and Koschitzke, Roughead and Franklin or Fraser and Pavlich available at the top end. The 2003 AFL draft didn't have a lot of height.

Nothing wrong with the Cooney pick, he was considered the only worthwhile top selection all that year. Although it would be interesting to find out what other clubs did offer for that pick.

Trading pick 4 would have been something to do, as Ray is not yet part of their best 22 players. The Bulldogs thought both Cooney and Ray were "exciting", that description is apt for Cooney but Farren Ray and "exciting" are not used in the same sentence very often.

The Bulldogs have always struggled to plan ahead, and never looked for a big ruckman to replace Wynd and overlooked a lot of tall prospects that could have helped Grant when he played, and taken his spot when he retired. Trading for a tall, using pick 4, would have been the way to go here. There was also Kepler Bradley available, maybe things would have turned out differently if the shorter Bulldogs had selected him and not the Bombers who were loaded with height, and maybe it would have been the same result.

The Bulldogs can consider this draft a success when they compare it to many others they had around that time, Cooney is a much better player than Tim Walsh, Sam Power and Jordan McMahon who were all first round picks.

The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - West Coast
Add CommentsAdd Comments
74
Vote
   


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - West Coast

11 - Beau Waters

20 - Samuel Butler

26 - Daniel McConnell


From The Age: Who your team picked
The club says "It was good, the three boys were rated in our top 20 and hopefully we’re right. We’ll know in a couple of years. Beau Waters, we rate him pretty high, he’s a skilled leftfooter. We’re looking for him to step into the fore reasonably quickly, but there’s no pressure on him to play next year."
Trevor Woodhouse, recruiting manager


The Eagles star in the drafts, probably why they are frequently a contending team as they use their resources to find the best available talent.

Another good outcome from this draft, and something that the other teams didn't achieve, was that their first pick did bring in the best player, the second pick they used brought in the second best player, that is the way it is supposed to go.

Waters brings the necessary ingredients for finals football. Tough at the ball, and the player, Waters was a very good pick in a draft that was not loaded with star prospects. Butler has also been a more than useful player for the Eagles, although injury has limited his availability. McConnell seemed like a good pick at the time, he didn't find a spot with the Eagles, but like they so often do, the Eagles were able to exchange a player that was not part of their future to another team for a draft pick.

The Eagles know how to scout the prospects and also how to move up in the drafts by trading wisely. That is why they usually land a star prospect or two in every draft they are in, and the 2003 AFL draft was not an exception.

The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Sydney

For AFL news and fantasy footy information, go to www.allfooty.info
Add CommentsAdd Comments
72
Vote
   


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Sydney

16 - Joshua Willoughby

29 -Tim Schmidt

45 - Amon Buchanan

47 - Andrew Ericksen

59 - Matthew Davis


From The Age: Who your team picked
The club says "Our whole line is continuing with the youth and shooting for the future. I’m not going to say we’re unhappy — we would’ve like to get the better picks — but that’s the legacy of coming third. When you pick where we do, you just wait for them to come through."
Ricky Barham, recruiting manager


They redrafted Buchanan after delisting him, they are fortunate someone else didn't take him. Schmidt is another player that has played regularly for Sydney.

Not finding a quality player with their first round pick in this draft is hurting the Sydney side at the moment as they could have someone like Mundy if they had drafted better.

The lack of drafting success with high picks does also show why trading them can be a good idea, and that is something that Sydney have benefited from. Sydney knew that Darren Jolly and Ted Richards could play at AFL level, while there is always the uncertainty of how a draftee is going to fare in the AFL.

The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - St Kilda

For AFL news and fantasy footy information, go to www.allfooty.info
Add CommentsAdd Comments
61
Vote
   


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - St Kilda

8 - Raphael Clarke

55 - Samuel Fisher

65 - Craig Callaghan

71 - pass

74 - pass

77 - pass


From The Age: Who your team picked
The club says "We’re very pleased to get young Raphael Clarke, he’s a very promising player. Most clubs would have rated him in their top group of players, he’s a lovely, graceful player. He’s played almost continuous footy for the past couple of years. Sam Fisher, he’s a good marking forward. You worry at 55 that you get to pick someone who you’re not too keen about, so this is good."
John Beveridge, recruiting manager


Sam Fisher has made this a very good draft by the Saints. While he has not become the "marking forward" they thought he would, and he didn't need to because they had Riewoldt, S Fisher has become a very impressive marking, running, long-kicking key defender.

Maybe R Clarke is "a lovely, graceful player" but to win a premiership a team needs more than love or grace, they need strength and ferocity. For a top 10 pick, R Clarke is just not good enough.

The Saints do like to delist someone and then redraft them. While some teams have been successful doing that, like Sydney with Buchanan, it hasn't produced anything great for the Saints, Callaghan then was just as useful as M Ferguson is now for St Kilda. Better to bring in someone new.

Sam Fisher was a steal, Raphael Clarke would have been a good selection at number 30 but not at number 8 and Dirty Harry would have been just as good as Craig later in the draft. Not the worst result from this draft, as a lot of teams came away with nothing, but if the Saints had found just one more star player from this draft they might have played in a Grand Final recently.

The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Richmond
Add CommentsAdd Comments
58
Vote
   


Player Of The Week

The Tigers won a game they were not expected to win, so a lot of the credit should go to their key forward, centre half back and their big, versatile player on the wing. All of those positions were played by Matthew Richardson.

4 goals by Richardson is an acceptable game, and he kicked that many here while also cutting off the Dockers' attacks with marks at half back and also providing a target on the wing for the Richmond defenders to go to.

While Pavlich played a solid game, Richardson had over double the marks that Pavlich recorded. Richardson also had as many contested marks as the entire opposition team did.

Every few years, Coach Wallace uses some gimmick tactics to win a game, like the excruciating backwards game against the Crows a few seasons back, so maybe the Tigers won't have continued success with Richardson in the role he had in the game against Fremantle. Although if Riewoldt and Polak continue to take marks up forward it might mean that Richardson becomes an older version of Goodes, when he was at his best, and just is a mismatch all over the field that other teams cannot contain.


Matthew Richardson's profile at the Richmond site


Round 3, Player Of The Week
Add CommentsAdd Comments
60
Vote
   


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Richmond

21 - Alex Gilmour

37 - Tom Roach

53 - Daniel Jackson

64 - Shane Morrison

70 - Brent Hartigan

73 - Shane Tuck

76 - Andrew Raines

79 - Simon Fletcher

81 - Kyle Archibald

82 - pass

83 - pass


From The Age: Who your team picked
The club says "This was a kids draft and we had to get as many kids as we could, and a number won’t be ready to play for a couple of years. But there was a need for Danny (Frawley) to have enough senior blokes who could play straight away, that’s why Morrison and Fletcher were picked, and even Shane Tuck to a lesser degree (because) he has played senior football for West Adelaide. And obviously we had to get a couple of talls through the door."
Greg Beck, Richmond recruiting manager


This draft shows why Richmond have struggled in recent years, while they did get something from their picks in the 70s, they missed with most of their earlier picks.

Nothing wrong with bringing in Raines and Tuck, and Jackson is also close to being part of their best side. Drafting Fletcher and Morrison because Frawley wanted some extra depth was a waste of draft picks. The trading and drafting during Frawley's time at Richmond did not provide many future stars for the Tigers.

The level of success, or lack of it, from this draft did enable Richmond to have pick 1 in the 2004 AFL draft.

The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Port Adelaide
Add CommentsAdd Comments
66
Vote
   


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Port Adelaide

15 - Troy Chaplin

30 - Bradley Symes

34 - Luke Peel

39 - Robert Forster-Knight

46 - Michael Pettigrew


From The Age: Who your team picked
The club says "I’m very happy. I think that we’ve been able to bring a couple of young people in that can play in our defence in the future, in particular Troy Chaplin, and also were pleased that we’ve been able to add to the playing experience of our defence by drafting Rob Forster-Knight."
Alan Stewart, recruiting manager.


Above are some good quotes that actually show they got what they were after. Chaplin and Pettigrew are important parts of their current back line. Symes also played some good games for the Power before he was traded to the Adelaide Crows. That is a success rate better than 50%, something few clubs in this draft achieved.

A lot of teams in this draft came up empty with their first round picks, something that is inexcusable. Port Adelaide brought in a solid player with their late first round choice, as Chaplin has the height for a key defensive spot and is also solid with his use of the ball.

Even though Pettigrew was the fifth player they took in this draft, he is also the one with the most star potential. Tall and athletic, Pettigrew could still take another step up in his play but even if he doesn't it was a successful pick by Port Adelaide. Other teams couldn't find talent in the top 10 while the Power were drafting quality players at pick 46.

Symes was taken at pick 30, and after a few years and some eventful games he was moved along to Adelaide for a similar pick. But there was more talent in the 2007 draft than the 2003 one, and the Power drafted another Motlop so that could pay dividends in a few years.

The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Melbourne


For AFL news and fantasy footy information, go to www.allfooty.info
Add CommentsAdd Comments
70
Vote
   


O'hAilpin Brothers Need To Escape Carlton

The Sydney Swans might be one of a number of teams that could use a couple of 2m tall defenders. Imagine Dunkley with more height and better kicking skills, that might be Setanta O'hAilpin. His younger, and slightly bigger, brother Aisake also has the build to be a dominant defender. Compared to the confusion at Carlton, the O'hAilpin brothers would be in a more settled situation at Sydney, surrounded by classy veteran teammates as well as a couple of Irish players.

Brett Ratten may be applauded by many in a couple of weeks, if he defeats Melbourne, but so many of his decisions are just too odd. When he took over as coach, he made a team that lacked strength and hustle even worse by dispatching Adam Bentick to the VFL. Now he has taken a Carlton team that is short in the back half, and made them even shorter by dismissing the contribution that Setanta O'hAilpin can make. Here is another mistake during the short Ratten era, a team that delisted one centre half forward and traded another away didn't even go tall with their preseason pick or their later two picks in the national draft. Pfeiffer, Browne and Armfield didn't fill a required need.

The O'hAilpin brothers need to look elsewhere, and would be great for the Swans, Bulldogs, Tigers, Demons or Hawks. At Carlton they are played out of position, when they are played, and Setanta seems to be blamed for defeats when there are others that are the reason. It is a shame to see two young players, who hustle and never give up, be treated this way by their club. The brothers need to get out when they can, as Carlton isn't going to change while Ratten, Lappin, Teague and others are still around. If only the rest of the Carlton players put in as much effort on the field as Setanta O'hAilpin does, maybe they would be looking towards the finals and not the early picks of the 2008 AFL draft.


From The Age: Trial and error

Aisake's demotion was part disciplinary. He had been dropped to the VFL twos following an on-field spat with Matthew Lappin, the veteran ex-Blue who has a joint coaching and playing role with Carlton's VFL affiliate.

When Carlton think of development, they think of Matthew Lappin. Which means Carlton are in a lot of trouble. In another jobs-for-the-boys decision, Lappin was kept around to supposedly develop Carlton's young players. Aisake O'hAilpin should be commended for not wanting to have anything to do with Lappin, not demoted to the VFL reserves.


Having invested heavily in the pair, Carlton is willing to continue the wait. "From our view point, we think that whilst the boys are still making progress, we still think it's an important project," said Carlton's football operations manager Stephen Icke. "Once they stop making progress, obviously we need to, we need to start asking some questions. But at the moment, they are still making progress, and that's why they're still on our list."

To say Carlton invested heavily in the O'hAilpin brothers is just wrong. They didn't use a high draft pick on either of them. They didn't give them huge salaries, like those that Thornton and Russell received not too long ago. Carlton didn't even bring in a highly-paid specialist coach for them, something that other clubs would have done. Carlton are talking about how the O'hAilpin brothers might "stop making progress", Houlihan stopped making progress after 10 games and they have kept him around for another decade.

Add CommentsAdd Comments
78
Vote
   


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Melbourne

3 - Colin Sylvia

5 - Brock McLean

36 - Christopher Johnson

52 - pass


From The Age: Who your team picked
The club says "We’re very happy with (Colin Sylvia and Brock McLean). They can come into our team and strengthen our midfield. They’re both tough, inside midfielders, two talented midfielders who can be strong leaders at our club in the near future."
Neale Daniher, senior coach


Melbourne have had internal problems for two decades, they were probably hoping that this draft would be a new beginning but as the headlines in the newspaper have said too often, all the Demons got was more of the same, or even a bit worse.

2008 might be the last year at Melbourne for Sylvia or McLean, probably the former. So not the best result from two picks in the top five of the AFL draft. At least McLean has shown he can play at a high level, so Melbourne will persist with him but won't mention him as "the next captain" like they used to. Sylvia doesn't have a real position as he hasn't made an impact in the middle or up forward, he hasn't really achieved anything on the field, and addition by subtraction could be the best that Melbourne can get if they move him after the season. If Coach Bailey is going to turn Melbourne around, he will need to take a broom to the list and sweep out a lot of the mistakes that the former coach and administration persisted with.

Chris Johnson has shown some promise, and it was a good move to bring him in as a father/son pick. He provides depth and is still improving. He was at least worth a third round pick, so Melbourne kept some tradition going and also added a solid prospect.

Melbourne are suffering now because of this draft, and plenty other drafts from the Daniher era. One mistake in 2003 was going small with both of the high picks. While this AFL draft wasn't loaded with height, Melbourne could have traded away one of their early picks to bring in a taller prospect. Maybe Sylvia and McLean will turn things around, and it seems that McLean is making an effort, but right now this is a draft that Melbourne fans should not be happy with.


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - North Melbourne
Add CommentsAdd Comments
92
Vote
   


Player Of The Week

North Melbourne had Mitchell and Hodge under control, and looked like they were going to get the win but the Hawks had a big comeback victory. While their key forwards will get a lot of deserved credit, it was midfielder Brad Sewell that kept Hawthorn in the contest and helped them overpower the Kangaroos in the final term.

While there really isn't a scoring end at the dome, with no breeze or other advantage, for some reason Sewell was at his best in the second and fourth quarters. Sewell had 26 of his 34 possessions in the even-numbered quarters. 11 marks for the game, along with 6 tackles and an important goal, Sewell was very busy against the Kangaroos.


Brad Sewell's profile at the Hawthorn site


Round 2, Player Of The Week
Add CommentsAdd Comments
92
Vote
   


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - North Melbourne

9 - David Trotter

24 - Chad Jones

40 - Edward Sansbury

56 - Brent Le Cras

66 - pass


From The Age: Who your team picked
The club says "We’re very happy with the quality of this draft and with the players we’ve picked up. Le Cras is a key back man who has worked very hard after missing out on earlier drafts. Sansbury kicked five goals, four on Adam Conney, in the SANFL grand final. They’ve all got a long-term future at the club."
Neville Stibbard, recruiting manager


The Kangaroos probably shouldn't have even turned up to this draft as they didn't use their picks that well. Eddie Sansbury is still around but he isn't a difference maker and not a key part of their team.

If the Kangaroos were not giving away first round picks to Hawthorn they were wasting them with who they selected. "A long-term future at the club", sometimes looking back on the quotes is quite amusing.

The 2003 draft should have been year 2 for the Kangaroos and their rebuilding. In the 2002 draft they did take McIntosh and Wells, but they also drafted Shore, Urch and Perry and those three players are not around now.

Players from more recent drafts like Hansen, Urquhart and Riggio are not getting a game at the moment, so if North Melbourne want to change around their onfield success they may want to start afresh with the people who choose their draft picks.

The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Hawthorn
Add CommentsAdd Comments
78
Vote
   


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Hawthorn

25 - Harry Miller

41 - Zac Dawson

51 - Matthew Ball


From The Age: Who your team picked
The club says "The objective was to select at least two younger, developing players, preferably at least one ruck or key-position prospect, which we’ve got with Zac Dawson, and an older more mature player who has come through Box Hill Hawks (Matthew Ball)."
John Turnbull, recruiting manager


This was a long way from the successful drafts that produced Franklin and other current Hawthorn stars. Miller and Ball are no longer there while Dawson is famous in his own way. Dawson played a couple of games against the strong power forwards of the AFL and got crushed. He is still on their list, and provides depth as a tall defender and maybe as a ruckman. Dawson doesn't really deserve the grief he gets, at pick 41 he wasn't supposed to be an instant star.

Hawthorn supporters should look at this as the low point of their recent history, but if the 2004 AFL draft was the start of their rise and also the commencement of a "5-year plan" then the 2009 season could be when it all comes together. They might even win it all in 2008, but the chances of the Hawks doing that would have been much greater if they had used their picks in 2003 a bit better.

The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Geelong

For AFL news and fantasy footy information, go to www.allfooty.info
Add CommentsAdd Comments
74
Vote
   


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Geelong

7 - Kane Tenace

22 - Cameron Thurley

38 - Mark Blake

42 - Matthew Spencer

54 - pass


From The Age: Who your team picked
The club says "Overall, we’re happy to get a combination of height and pace. We were happy to take Tenace because he adds something to our midfield that we haven’t got, which is electric pace. We’ve got more of a workman-like midfield. Cameron Thurley has played for Tasmania against AFLlisted players, is quick and a dangerous goalsneak, an Akermanis type. Matthew Spencer can play centre-half forward/centre-half back at 195 centimetres."
Mark Thompson, senior coach

Sometimes the clubs get a bit excited after they have picked their players. Cameron Thurley didn't get too close to being another Akermanis.

Where would the Cats be without the father/son picks, that allowance provided the Cats with their most useful player out of their picks from this AFL draft, ruckman Mark Blake. Blake is going to be a valuable ruckman for a long time. The Cats probably had the right idea when they went looking for some speedy players with their early picks, but they didn't pick the right ones. Spencer did have the size for AFL, so it wasn't a bad choice later in the draft.

The other teams should be happy that Geelong didn't have a lot of success in this draft, none of these players played in the 2007 AFL Grand Final, although Blake certainly was close. The Cats could have left the 2003 AFL draft with Beau Waters, Jed Adcock, Mark Blake and Sam Fisher, and that would have made them an even better team than they are now.

The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Fremantle

For AFL news and fantasy footy information, go to www.allfooty.info
Add CommentsAdd Comments
77
Vote
   


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Fremantle

10 - Ryley Dunn

12 - Ryan Murphy

19 - David Mundy

27 - Adam Campbell

43 - Brett Peake


From The Age: Who your team picked
The club says "We took the best players available. As it turned out, they were all Vic Country kids. Ryley Dunn is an aggressive, good running player we expect to play midfield and up forward. Ryan Murphy has good speed and good stamina for a player his size; he has to improve his concentration but we expect him to come along. David Mundy is your third tall defender. Adam Campbell, with his rugby background in New Zealand, is hard at the ball and a good mark, especially on the lead. Brett Peake (father-son rule) is slighter than his father (former All-Australian captain, Brian) but we expect him to play in the midfield."
Phil Smart, recruiting manager


You could turn the picks upside down and it would probably look right, with Peake the first player they took and Dunn being a later pick instead of a first rounder.

The Dockers thought Murphy needed more "concentration", when he is kicking for goal there is really no Docker who seems to concentrate as much on that or kick as accurately, although Pavlich probably does.

Mundy is the best of the lot. Using the ball well and able to help in several different positions. Maybe Fremantle will put Tarrant on the wing, and that would create room for both Campbell and Murphy to play up forward.

All the picks are still on the Fremantle list, but with Dunn a rookie, so that shows that the Dockers had a solid draft.


The Good and Bad of the 2003 AFL Draft - Essendon
Add CommentsAdd Comments
78
Vote
   


Player Of The Week

The first quarter of a game can be very important. That is what Corey Jones has shown the AFL in the first two rounds. Against Essendon he was eliminated from the proceedings very early in the game due to friendly fire, and against Richmond he kicked goal after goal in the first quarter to set up the win.

If Corey Jones was a midfielder he would have had a successful day with the statistics of 11 kicks and 8 handballs. If Jones was a star full forward a return of 7 goals and 2 behinds would be considered a great return. He combined all those numbers, plus a couple of tackles and a bunch of free kicks, in the North Melbourne win.

Richmond went with a small, but quick player, on Jones to start the game. They then tried a quicker player before going with a larger, but slower, defender on him. Nothing worked as Jones had a mismatch to use to his advantage with all the players that Richmond used.

Jones was reportedly very close to sitting out round 2, luckily for the Kangaroos he proved his fitness and the only ones with a headache in round 2 would have been the people in the Richmond coaching box who were trying to find someone to contain him.


Corey Jones' profile at the North Melbourne site


Round 1, Player Of The Week
Add CommentsAdd Comments
63
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
2 Posts
23 Posts
2162 Posts dating from January 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Tom Slack 2's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Tom Slack 2
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]